Olivier Lacan { thoughts }

Gowalla for beginners

Call me a Google whore, but I just noticed some­one who found my pre­vi­ous post about Gowalla using the key­words “gowalla” and “begin­ner” and that gave me a great idea for a lit­tle Gowalla primer. I’ve seen quite a few peo­ple moan about the lack of doc­u­men­ta­tion on Gowalla’s web­site or any­where else for that mat­ter. I don’t think this is the most cru­cial thing for the Alam­ofire team to develop at this point. Bet­ter yet I think that like Twit­ter, they should (and might) expect the Gowalla com­mu­nity to cre­ate tools and infor­ma­tion for and about itself. The Street Team Elite is a good exam­ple of that, and hav­ing been a mem­ber of said STE for a day I’m already impressed at how well orga­nized it is.

So let’s cut to the chase, here’s a quick run­down of Gowalla for beginners.

First Steps

Go to gowalla.com and click on the big red but­ton that invites you to “Join Gowalla”.

Join Gowalla

So far so good, now behold a beau­ti­ful lit­tle sign up form. Not as suc­cint as Tumblr’s but quite quick to fill as well. You’re going to need to fill in your first and last name (which can be edited later on if your para­noid or afraid of stalk­ers). I sug­gest putting in your real name, we’re past the whole nickname/pseudonym craze of the early noughties, but some may have objec­tions. Your user­name, as you can see, will be used to pro­vide a short address to your Gowalla pro­file, so it’s not a login and will there­fore be vis­i­ble. Most of the Gowalla team chose very short initial-type user­name (jg for John Galt) which is obvi­ously not going to leave a lot of spots for future users to imi­tate. I’m a pro­po­nent of the fullname-lowercased-nospace school (john­galt for John Galt).

Be aware that while Gowalla allows you to change your user­name after sign­ing up for the moment, it isn’t rec­om­mended and may become dif­fi­cult or impos­si­ble in the near future since the most com­mon user­names won’t be avail­able any­more. So if you missed out on the early days of twit­ter and want to make up for it by get­ting a super short user­name, go nuts! After that it’s email time, this will be used as your login and you will be sent a con­fir­ma­tion email to that address.

In Octo­ber when I joined, the email didn’t con­tain any con­fir­ma­tion link to ensure that the email address is indeed yours. I hope this changes in the future, since user­name squat­ting might become an issue if Gowalla gets a broader audi­ence. And finally for the pass­word you will be asked to enter 6 char­ac­ters or more and to “be tricky!”. I’m sure you can han­dle that.

Gowalla - Sign Up Form

I don’t remem­ber what hap­pens after this step on the web­site itself. But most likely you will be auto­mat­i­cally logged in to your new account and should see a page not dis­sim­i­lar to this.

Pass­port

Gowalla - User page

Of course all the coun­ters should indi­cate 0 instead of what you see on my pro­file. But that’s OK, you’ll have plenty of time to go explore and catch up on me. Let’s break down this view. First you see that there are 4 dif­fer­ent tabs in the main nav­i­ga­tion (called a card stack by us web folk). Pass­port is the name of your pro­file page, you will be auto­mat­i­cally redi­rected to this page instead of the usual Gowalla home page if you are signed in to your account. Next there is Spots, Trips and Friends. We’ll talk about these pages later. Let’s con­cen­trate on Pass­port for now.

Instead of a pic­ture of my mug, on the top left side you will see a default avatar with long hair (inter­est­ing choice). A trip down to the set­tings page (top right cor­ner) will allow you to change that. But let’s con­tinue. Next to your face, your user­name is dis­played. After that the num­ber of Stamps you have. Stamps are sim­ply all the places you’ve been to.

Stamps

Gowalla - Your Stamps

Since Gowalla is played using a cell­phone (for now only the iPhone), that means that the stamps will rep­re­sent all the places you phys­i­cally went to, whipped out your fancy phone, opened the Gowalla appli­ca­tion and tapped on “Check In” for the Spot you were at. A Spot was either cre­ated by you, some­one else play­ing Gowalla, or some­one from the Gowalla team in Austin, Texas. And every time you check in to one of the var­i­ous Spots around the world, your “pass­port” gets “stamped” with a pretty lit­tle icon like those yummy chicken wings that rep­re­sent KFC on the pic­ture above. And all those places you’ve been to will be logged on your Gowalla pass­port as long as your remem­ber to “check-in” with your

cell­phone. It’s not auto­matic, and you under­stand per­fectly well that this is a good thing.

Gowalla isn’t a spy in your pocket, it’s sim­ply a way for you to track where you’ve been or share this infor­ma­tion with your friends or the world. Yes it’s triv­ial, as much as trav­el­ing and going out is triv­ial. If you click on this Stamp counter you will be taken to a sub-page (see on the right) that lists all the stamps from every Spot you’ve ever vis­ited. You’ll also be able to see which of those were fea­tured spots, and States. So far inter­na­tional coun­tries have not been added although it has been hinted as a pos­si­ble future fea­ture, obvi­ously eagerly awaited.

Pins

Gowalla - Pins

Pins come next, and they are — as you’d expect — rewards that you earn under cer­tain spe­cific con­di­tions. When you log in to your Gowalla Pass­port for the first time you will already have a Pin. The “I Installed Gowalla!” one which is awarded by default. Oddly, you can only access details about Pins on the iPhone Gowalla app by gow­ing to the Trips tab. Why are Pins mixed with Trips on the iPhone, I’m stumped. I wish this fea­ture was acces­si­ble on the web­site and cor­rectly sorted on the iPhone app. Still this gives us a lot of use­ful information.

List of Gowalla Pins
  • I Installed Gowalla! — 0 (81596 peo­ple so far)
  • Wan­derer — check in at 5 dif­fer­ent spots
  • Sight­seer — check in at 10 dif­fer­ent spots
  • Ranger — check in at 25 dif­fer­ent spots
  • Dis­cov­erer — check in at 50 dif­fer­ent spots
  • Explorer — check in at 100 dif­fer­ent spots
  • Way­farer — check in at 250 dif­fer­ent spots
  • Voy­ager — check in at 500 dif­fer­ent spots
  • Epic Voy­ager - check in at 1000 dif­fer­ent spots
  • Com­mis­sioned 10 Spots
  • Com­mis­sioned 25 spots
  • Com­mis­sioned 50 spots
  • Com­mis­sioned 100 spots
  • Founded 10 Spots
  • Founded 25 spots
  • Founded 50 spots
  • Founded 100 spots
  • Visit 10 coffeeshops
  • Code Mon­key — check in at 5 tech­nol­ogy startups
  • Engi­neer — check in at 10 tech­nol­ogy startups
  • Hacker — check in at 25 tech­nol­ogy startups
  • The CTO — check in at 50 tech­nol­ogy startups

A new “Get Out with Incase!” Pin was added today after the release of a new Incase iPhone Sleeve item. The offi­cial Gowalla blog explains that there will in fact be six Incase items added to Gowalla and if all those items are col­lected, this Pin will be awarded. Bet­ter yet, some lucky users will win actual Incase prod­ucts when they col­lect the vir­tual Gowalla items in the game at select Apple Stores around the world. This is sim­i­lar to a first exper­i­ment dur­ing the Decem­ber 2009 called “The 10 and a Half Days of Christ­mas” dur­ing which the Alam­ofire team hid 600 vir­tual gifts con­tain­ing real-world Gowalla-branded iPod Nanos, T-Shirts and iTunes cards.

Items

Gowalla - Items

So what are these Items I keep men­tion­ing? Well every time you check in at an exist­ing spot or one you just cre­ated, there is a seem­ingly ran­dom chance that you might receive an item cor­re­spond­ing to the type of Spot you are check­ing into (Tacos for Taco Bell, Cof­fee cups at Star­bucks, or a Bookreader at Barnes & Noble). On your phone, you can only hold 10 items at any given time. As the The Unwrit­ten Man­ual tells us “Each item is seri­al­ized and they are lim­ited in issue. As to how lim­ited, time will tell.” You can see the ser­ial num­ber of each item under its name.

What hap­pens when you’ve got 10 items and you want more? Two options.

You can drop an item at a Spot and if you do you will become a Founder of this Spot. This may allow you to obtain one of the Pins listed ear­lier. But it also has two effects on the game. “This helps us deter­mine which spots are highly traf­ficked, and ulti­mately, which spots we should fea­ture. Spot founders will receive recog­ni­tion for their sac­ri­fice in the future.” says Gowalla co-creator Josh Williams on the afore­men­tioned blog post.

Or you can vault any item in your pack. This means that you per­ma­nently remove the item from the game and add it to a per­sonal col­lec­tion. To date there are 93 unique items in Gowalla with more added reg­u­larly. But so far, there doesn’t seem to be a reward (Pin) when you col­lect all of them. On the lat­est ver­sion of the iPhone app, it is now pos­si­ble to vault an item. But it’s not pos­si­ble to see the con­tent of one’s vault except from the gowalla.com web­site. Which may cause a prob­lem if one acci­den­tally vaults two or more of the same item (which sadly is pos­si­ble with­out any warn­ing from the app) since it is impos­si­ble to remove an item from the Vault. Once Vaulted, gone forever.

That’s about it for now. This post will be updated to include infor­ma­tion about Set­tings and oth­ers sec­tions later on.

Gowalla & Crowd Mapping

Gowalla LogoI joined Gowalla on Octo­ber 8th 2009. While not really being an early adopter, there didn’t seem to be much global excite­ment about it when I joined. I think the first time I heard about it was through Jef­frey Zeld­man’s twit­ter updates. They were odd, sim­ply men­tion­ing a fact and always had a short url like this one http://gowal.la/s/7v4. I clicked on a few and was puz­zled by what I saw. Instead of an ugly twit­ter image host­ing ser­vice or sim­ply a link to a ran­dom web­page, there was a map, a list of names, cre­ators, founders, a pretty icon and a deli­ciously slick XHTML and CSS3 web­site with sub­tle tones and an unusu­ally sophis­ti­cated design.

As a silly web designer I high­lighted some of the text with my mouse to check if the text shad­ow­ing was code or graph­ics. It wasn’t graph­ics: “oooh nice!”. Then I looked around, there wasn’t much expla­na­tion about what was going on. One short video on the home page explained the con­cept. You go some­where, you check in to a “spot”, if it doesn’t exist, you sim­ply cre­ate it. That’s it? What’s the point? It was left for me to fig­ure it out. A few @Zeldman tweets later, I kept click­ing on the links and I fig­ure out (organ­i­cally) that the check-ins were counted, or rather “stamped”. And for some rea­son, Zeld­man had earned some “Pins”. Things like “Vis­ited 10 cof­feeshops” or “Ranger”. Again, no expla­na­tions. But again, inter­est­ing mys­ter­ies. After a dozen Zeld­man nods I finally fig­ured I could sign up and maybe elu­ci­date the mys­tery. And to give credit to the appeal to author­ity, man­ag­ing to turn a father of web stan­dards into an addict made me want to under­stand who these guys from Austin, Texas were and how they did it.

Clearly they weren’t strangers to the web design world, there are nods to the best and bright­est of the field all around Gowalla, from Pins (Airbag Indus­tries, Design­ing with Web Stan­dards, Jim Coudal’s Field Notes) to spe­cial spots with rare cus­tom icons like the Happy Cog HQ. Throw in a Mint leaf and it would be perfect.

Gowalla shares a com­mon issue for begin­ners with Twit­ter. It’s hard if you don’t use it heav­ily to grasp at first how good or even how use­ful it is. Twit­ter is use­less with­out inter­est­ing and ver­bose peo­ple to fol­low or fol­low­ers to dis­cuss ideas and points of view with. Gowalla seems point­less before the game dynam­ics are under­stood (they aren’t explained) and before the social map­ping aspect sinks in. Gowalla isn’t a map, it’s a note­book wait­ing for you to explore and fill it with what you see. Which is explained very suc­cinctly by the slo­gan “Go out. Go dis­cover. Go share. Gowalla.”.

There is a lot of free­dom involved. Some peo­ple will want to map every­thing they see to gain Stamps and obtain Pins faster. Oth­ers will only cre­ate or check-in at the places they really like, to make the expe­ri­ence more per­sonal. The for­mer will not cre­ate a lot of edi­to­r­ial value, but they will cre­ate map­ping value. Since Gowalla uses Google Maps, it can over­lay its data­base on top of it and dis­play innu­mer­able (300,000 so far) user-generated Spots few of which prob­a­bly already existed in Google’s data­base. Because even if busi­nesses have a clear advan­tage if they are listed on Google Maps, most of them don’t know it or sim­ply don’t care. Gowalla gets rid of this infor­ma­tion input bot­tle­neck by shift­ing the incen­tive to map busi­nesses on the client him­self. If it sounds hard to con­ceive, it shows you how bril­liant it is.

Google tried to do this by mak­ing Image tag­ging “fun” on Google Images so that peo­ple would iden­tify objects and traits in ran­domly shown pho­tographs so that they would become search­able items. Alam­ofire (the cre­ators of Gowalla) suceeeded because they focused on the game. I’m not even sure they ever con­sid­ered how pow­er­ful the game could become for crowd map­ping. If they did, con­grat­u­la­tions to them for man­ag­ing to focus on the essen­tial fun and not the long term busi­ness goal. Because as it’s been obvi­ous to me after the first few weeks of use, and was hope­fully obvi­ous also to the peo­ple who invested 8.5 mil­lion dol­lars in it Gowalla early Decem­ber, the “game” could become very lucra­tive if its soon-to-be immense and individual-powered map of the world was mon­e­tized somehow.

But let’s not for­get about the fun side of things. Alam­ofire is appar­ently a small com­pany. Like Twit­ter it doesn’t seem to be run by com­mit­tee. Instead the guys from Austin grad­u­ally try to make their game bet­ter and acces­si­ble to more mobile users on dif­fer­ent plat­forms. Gowalla is so far only avail­able on the iPhone. It’s not yet avail­able with native apps on the Palm Pré or the var­i­ous Android phones out there. Icons and items are added drop by drop. There doesn’t seem to be a sys­tem­atic approach, it’s sim­ply based on whim or cur­rent events. That may sound care­less for a com­pany that now has a lot of money vested in its even­tual prof­itabil­ity, but this is pre­cisely how you can keep the fire burn­ing for cre­ative peo­ple. And Gowalla is based on them, made for and by them.

One of the unde­vel­oped core fea­tures of Gowalla is Trips. You can obtain badges by com­plet­ing cer­tain require­ments (found­ing 50 spots for instance) but Trips can only be unlocked by check­ing in a spe­cific Fea­tured Spots. These spots have been either cre­ated or edited by the Gowalla team because they are deemed spe­cial in a cer­tain way and also receive a nicely designed cus­tom badge to make them stand out from the rest. Trips are sim­ply sets of fea­tured spots, and if you man­age to check-in at all of the spots in a Cen­tral Park trip for instance, you unlock a spe­cial Badge which can­not be unlocked any other way. Of course these trips require a lot more top-down inter­ven­tion from the Alam­ofire team. But in an email to Gowallers, Josh Williams the co-creator (with Scott Ray­mond) of Gowalla announced that 2010 will see the release of trip cre­ation tools for the com­mu­nity. Another step towards increas­ing user addic­tion, and a very excit­ing perspective.

While Face­book was born on the PC, Twit­ter through SMS, Gowalla is one of the first suc­cess­ful web appli­ca­tion which solely relies on Mobile com­put­ing and geolo­ca­tion. And to fol­low the voices of many, I see a very bright future for Gowalla in 2010.

Imaginationland

Lost - Pierre Chang

Lost isn’t only one of the best look­ing (cin­e­matog­ra­phy) shows in the his­tory of net­work TV. It’s also one where imag­i­na­tion, science-fiction, and most of all Soci­ety is explored far bet­ter than most peo­ple real­ize. I mean soci­ety as the orga­ni­za­tion of human lives as a group — with or with­out lead­ers — and their inter­re­la­tions. This, to me, is the most impor­tant aspect of the show. In igno­rance of its core con­cept, peo­ple some­times brush it off as silly absurd science-fiction. It’s as if they were read­ing The Catcher in the Rye and com­ment­ing on the improb­a­bil­ity of a kid wan­der­ing off by him­self in New York City. It’s miss­ing the point entirely, and stay­ing fix­ated on the super­fi­cially shock­ing instead of look­ing at the deeply relevant.

Know­ing what Dharma (or Alvar Hanso) is, is indeed inter­est­ing, but what’s fas­ci­nat­ing to me is how fac­tions inter­ract. Who decides that the End Jus­ti­fied The Means, who lets peo­ple make their own mis­takes rather than try­ing to pro­tect them for­ever. Who believes peo­ple are inher­ently bad, and who lies in the shadow of the statue.

The Fall of Comcast

The Fall of ComcastFirst off, let me assert the fact that I’m not a bit­ter per­son. I’ve had my share of DSL issues in Paris (France) with an ISP (NOOS, now Numer­i­ca­ble) which makes Com­cast look like a gen­tle baby seal in com­par­i­son. A con­nec­tion prob­lem on NOOS meant 0.5kb/s down­load speed for a month with no other solu­tion than wait­ing for them to repair the net­work node. And of course, no com­pen­sa­tion offered for the absence of ser­vice dur­ing a month.

That, was ISP hell.

Com­cast, most of the time is only a mediocre ISP. Their web­site is less unbe­liev­ably messy (infor­ma­tion archi­tec­ture being the key issue) than BrightHouse’s but still remains a cry­ing shame for a com­pany that is one of the key play­ers on the inter­net. As one of my friends recently put it when I had a con­ver­sa­tion with him about ISP hav­ing con­fus­ing web­sites: “You wouldn’t be on the Inter­net if it weren’t from them, and they can’t even get it right.”

Pre­cisely. If you excuse the web designer lingo, Comcast’s home page sports a hybrid design with nested table ele­ments and nasty spell of DIVi­tis. It doesn’t even come close to val­i­date against the W3C stan­dards (254 Errors, 8 warn­ings). Let’s not even talk about acces­si­bil­ity, why would the hand­i­capped need the internet?

But let’s leave that alone, and just imag­ine that your modem has a con­nec­tiv­ity issue. In my case, slow speeds (100kb/s tops) and recur­ring dis­con­nec­tions for no appar­ent rea­son. No major down­load, no ongo­ing bit tor­rent activ­ity. Now push that sce­nario a lit­tle fur­ther: boom, no more con­nec­tion. Modem dead. How do you reach sup­port? Well you call them. Assum­ing you had the num­ber jot­ted down some­where. Which I guess is what you do when you’ve been a Com­cast user a long time — I haven’t.

So using what­ever way you can — shout­ing in the street, going geek-hunting or… steal­ing your neighbor’s wifi — you fig­ure out the num­ber is 1–800-COMCAST or 1–800-266‑2278. You pro­ceed to call.

- Hello this is Michael Jor­dan.
– And this is Ben Stein, wel­come to Comcast!

What. the. fuck?!
Yes I under­stand the need to asso­ciate your com­pany with lik­able pub­lic fig­ure to appease your cus­tomers and bring them warm and fuzzy recolec­tions of Michael Jor­dan dunk­ing a ball after an very improb­a­bly long jump. But Ben Stein? Really?! This anti-science cre­ation­ist loon? Well sure, if polar­iz­ing your cus­tomers with ran­dom unre­lated celebri­ties is how you like to set them up for cus­tomer support.

After a few min­utes of nav­i­gat­ing the hotline’s menus I finally find the one ded­i­cated to tech­ni­cal sup­port for an inter­net line (isn’t it your num­ber 1 sup­port issue? Why isn’t that the first thing the cus­tomer is offered?). I press what­ever but­ton I was asked to press to be put on hold until the next avail­able representative.

Except that, appar­ently, between the hun­dreds — I hope thou­sands — of cus­tomer sup­port peo­ple Com­cast has on its pay­roll there is sim­ply not a sin­gle one that will be able to answer my call right now. None? Really? Do you just mean the wait­ing time is so long, that the sys­tem was designed to become self-conscious after more than 20 min­utes of wait become necessary?

Of course I’ve seen this before, in France the very relaxed voice usu­ally tells you that this is due to the high vol­ume of calls and that a safe bet is to try again later on in the day, just in case the wait­ing line isn’t so embar­rass­ing any­more. What if the cus­tomer doesn’t want to call again? What if this is a work-related emer­gency from some­one who works at home on the inter­net and has a deadline?

In dis­be­lief, I try to call again, same answer. After a few fum­ing min­utes, I decide to go back to Comcast’s dreaded home page and look for inter­net chat sup­port. I’ve tried it a cou­ple of times on other ser­vices and one clear advan­tage is the lack of uplift­ing wait­ing music. And for transparency’s sake, here’s what hap­pened next. Let me be clear, you shouldn’t read this, as much as I shouldn’t have had to read it being slowly typed into my browser. But if you do read it, con­sider the time my “sup­port expe­ri­ence” took.

Live­As­sist Tran­script
[Print] Print [Copy] Copy [Email] Email [Close] Close
chat id : 3c8408a9-255d-48e5-83a5-3cba34fd5f59
Prob­lem : Slow con­nec­tion, con­stant dis­con­nec­tions on the com­cast modem. Not a router prob­lem, was test with 2 dif­fer­ent routers with same results

Olivier > Slow con­nec­tion, con­stant dis­con­nec­tions on the com­cast modem. Not a router prob­lem, was test with 2 dif­fer­ent routers with same results

Loren > Hello Olivier, Thank you for con­tact­ing Com­cast Live Chat Sup­port. My name is Loren. Please give me one moment to review your infor­ma­tion.

Loren > Please wait, while the prob­lem is esca­lated to another ana­lyst

Gre­gory > Hello Olivier, Thank you for con­tact­ing Com­cast Live Chat Sup­port. My name is Gre­gory. Please give me one moment to review your infor­ma­tion.

Olivier > Hello

Gre­gory > How’s it going today Olivier?

Olivier > Could be bet­ter

Olivier > I’d like to know if there are known net­work issues in my area or if my modem could be at cause

Olivier > Com­cast plan is under my landlord’s name, [redacted]

Olivier > Her phone is [redacted]

Gre­gory > Just one moment please.

Olivier > sure

Olivier > Hello?

Gre­gory > I can help you with that, can you hold for one moment while I process your infor­ma­tion?

Gre­gory > Try­ing to pull up your account infor­ma­tion.

Olivier > ok

Gre­gory > Let me run a health check on your modem for you.

Olivier > Ok

Olivier > just so you know, I’m con­nected to my neighbor’s wifi right now

Gre­gory > I see what the issue is Olivier.

Gre­gory > Let me get you directed to the cor­rect depart­ment.

Olivier > and the issue would be?

Gre­gory > Just one moment please.

Gre­gory > Please wait, while the prob­lem is esca­lated to another ana­lyst

Olivier > alright

Andres > I am more than glad to assist you today with your order. It will take me just a few min­utes to pull up your account in our ystem. I will let you know if I have any ques­tions.

Olivier > Andres, here’s hop­ing you’ll be more talk­a­tive than Gre­gory

Andres > How are you today Mr.Lacan?

Olivier > I could be bet­ter.

Olivier > How are you?

Andres > How are you today Mr.Lacan?

Andres > I am doing great! Thank you for ask­ing me! Sure I will assit you today Mr.Lacan.

Olivier > Ok

Olivier > Gre­gory appar­ently found what was the issue with my modem. At least that’s what I gather

Olivier > Could you please enlighten me?

Andres > So you are hav­ing prob­lems with your inter­net Mr.Lacan?

Olivier > yes

Olivier > dis­con­nec­tions, reg­u­larly. Slow speed, for a few days/weeks now.

Olivier > The web being my work, it’s crip­pling.

Andres > Mr.Lacan I apol­o­gize for the incon­ve­nient but my area is not trou­bleshoot­ing. I rec­om­mend you to call to 1–800-Comcast and they will put you with a tech­ni­cian and he will help you.

Olivier > I did

Olivier > And they redi­rected me to Comcast.net

Olivier > which is not a sup­port site.

Olivier > The phone num­ber is appar­ently over­loaded. So I sug­gest you maybe do what two of your col­leagues did before you: trans­fer me to some­one who can (hope­fully) chat and trou­bleshoot.

Andres > Ok Mr.Lacan I will trans­fer you to another agent. I apol­o­gize for the incon­ve­nient.

Olivier > Thank you

Andres > Have a nice day.

Andres > Please wait, while the prob­lem is esca­lated to another analyst

Michael > hello

Olivier > Michael! So glad to meet you.

Olivier > Do you do trou­bleshoot­ing?

Michael > Please wait, while the prob­lem is esca­lated to another analyst

June > ikThank you for vis­it­ing Comcast.com. What ques­tions can I answer for you?

Olivier > Hello, June.

Olivier > Can you trou­bleshoot?

Olivier > Or do I need to be intro­duced to my fifth ana­lyst?

June > I do apol­o­gize, Olivier.

Olivier > Thank you.

June > As what I read in the pre­vi­ous chat tran­script, your issue is regard­ing your modem.

June > Is that cor­rect?

Olivier > Yes.

June > Thank you for ver­i­fy­ing.

June > You have been routed to a Sales depart­ment.

Olivier > Ah.

June > Let me con­nect you to our tech­ni­cal depart­ment.

June > Will this be fine with you?

Olivier > That’d be great.

June > Thank you for under­stand­ing.

Olivier > All I can do.

June > Please wait, while the prob­lem is esca­lated to another analyst

Susana > I am pleased to assist you today, how are you?

Olivier > I’m doing some­what less good than 5 ana­lysts ago. But thank you, how are you?

Susana > I def­i­nitely under­stand how incon­ve­nient it must be in your part. Let me do every­thing to get this issue resolved for you within this chat smile

Susana > I am doing great.

Susana > Since when did this issue hap­pen, Olivier?

Olivier > I’d say a few days if not weeks.

Olivier > But it did hap­pen before.

Susana > Are the wirings secure and is every­thing plugged cor­rectly?

Olivier > Yes, eth­er­net cables have been checked.

Olivier > And I’ve used two dif­fer­ent routers to test the WiFi reception/Ethernet rout­ing

Olivier > The coax cable going to the modem is also secure.

Susana > I will now run a series of diag­nos­tics to check on the sta­tus of your con­nec­tion and devices from my end.

Olivier > Ok.

Olivier > Oops, clicked the wrong but­ton.

Olivier > Can you still see me?

Susana > Yes I can still see you

Olivier > Ok.

Susana > There indeed is a slight prob­lem detected with your con­nec­tion. How­ever, do not worry as this is noth­ing that I can­not fix remotely on my end. Can you please hold for a few min­utes while I per­form the nec­es­sary trou­bleshoot­ing steps from my end?

Olivier > Of course.

Susana > Thank you for your patience.

Susana > Done. Now let me run a final health check to val­i­date that the sig­nals have improved before we end the ses­sion.

Olivier > Great.

Olivier > Was it a firmware problen on the modem end?

Olivier > In case you didn’t see my mes­sage: Was it a firmware problen on the modem end?

Susana > Firmware prob­lems only occur with routers, Olivier.

Susana > The rea­son for this is just a sys­tem glitch from our end. How­ever it is now improved.

Olivier > Ok, great.

Susana > Great news, I just retrieved the results of the final health check and it is show­ing that the con­nec­tion has improved with a more sta­ble and higher speed. All sig­nals are in green, the sys­tem has been refreshed and prop­erly con­fig­ured.

Susana > Now all you need for the changes to fully take effect on your end is to pow­er­cy­cle your modem cor­rectly as out­lined on this link: http://lite.help.comcast.net/content/faq/guid/e1b0fbaa-ebee-4553-a55d-d529dab07e09#power

Olivier > Thank you for your help.

Susana > You’re wel­come. I can’t be more glad know­ing that your sat­is­fac­tion is guar­an­teed.

Susana > Is there any­thing else that I can resolve for you aside from this?

Olivier > Who should I con­tact if any­thing sim­i­lar hap­pens?

Susana > Since you are now online, you may want to watch videos for free as a com­cast sub­scriber at www.fancast.com.

Susana > Please con­tact your local office at 1800 266 2278 for a modem replace­ment if same issue occurs.

Susana > How­ever I doubt that.

Olivier > Ok,

Susana > It should be good to go

Olivier > Thanks again.

Susana > After this chat ses­sion, there may be a quick 3-question sur­vey that will pop up. It would really mean a lot to me if you con­sider this issue resolved. Are you okay with that?

Olivier > A sug­ges­tion

Olivier > Yes, the issue seems resolved so far :-)

Olivier > Quick sug­ges­tion, if it mat­ters. Who­ever cre­ated this chat sys­tem might want to have the lines wrap­ping inside the win­dow, so users don’t need to scroll hor­i­zon­tally every time the ana­lyst says some­thing to see it.

Susana > It is, I assure you

Susana > Thank you very much for the sug­ges­tion. I will make sure it is passed

Susana > smile

Olivier > Good.

Susana > Thank you very much Olivier, please click on the END SESSION but­ton to answer the sur­vey as the issue has been resolved smile

Olivier > Good night.

Olivier > Alright, thanks for being the most effi­cient per­son I met today.

Susana > Ana­lyst has closed chat and left the room

As you can see I jumped a line in the tran­script every time I was “esca­lated” to another “ana­lyst”. Five times, 5, Cinq, or rather five fuck­ing times where it wasn’t the ana­lysts but I who had to even­tu­ally fig­ure out if they were the com­pe­tent per­son to solve my prob­lem despite them already hav­ing read a tran­script of my prob­lem descrip­tion. Or maybe this is part of the prob­lem, maybe being “esca­lated” sim­ply means that what­ever ana­lyst came before sim­ply dumped me onto a new one with lit­tle to no infor­ma­tion about my issue. That would cer­tainly explain the few min­utes of niceties before they real­ized that — oh, wait — the couldn’t help me. But they sure all stuck to the script when it came to the niceties.

A lit­tle ques­tion for their man­agers. Would you rather some­one be cour­te­ous and waste 5 min­utes of your time in a slow inter­net chat back and forth and this for 5 con­sec­u­tive instances, or would you per­haps like to get on with the fuck­ing prob­lem already and assume I am not hav­ing a great day, or else why would any­one spend it talk­ing to cus­tomer support?

So, skip the “How are you?”, and don’t dare tell me “How can I help you?” after I described it at length with:
– your online sup­port chat form
– the first “ana­lyst“
– the sec­ond “ana­lyst“
– the third “ana­lyst“
– and the fourth “analyst”

Nice to meet your Mr. Smith, I am look­ing into the cause of the prob­lem you described to us and will come back to you shortly with more infor­ma­tion”.
Take it, it’s free. That’s all you need. That’s how you engage a cus­tomer by mak­ing him under­stand that what­ever action he first took to describe his prob­lem prop­erly in the hopes of mak­ing his support’s job eas­ier wasn’t com­pletly wasted. Addi­tion­ally it sets him up for the unavoid­able wait while a tech­ni­cian (not an ana­lyst, ana­lysts work at the CIA, or on Wall Street) runs a series of tests (phys­i­cal or log­i­cal) to nar­row down the cause of the prob­lem. Of the five peo­ple the peo­ple I talked to, only two (June and Susana) referred to my pre­vi­ous chats and seemed to at least have glanced over my pre­vi­ous descrip­tions of my problem.

By read­ing the end­ing of my dis­cus­sion with the very nice Susana, you would assume that my prob­lem was thor­oughly resolved, right?
Nope. After care­ful test­ing — which I couldn’t do or didn’t think to do after I was told that every­thing was “green” — I real­ized that my band­width was still nowhere close to the 6mpbs I could reach only two weeks prior. And my very strange down­load speed con­tin­ued.
It would go up to 300kb/s then sharply drop to 150, and finally oscil­late between 80kb/s and 110kb/s.

So I called again, this time I scored some­one on the phone. Lucky me!
I had a friend’s DOCSIS 2.0 Motorola modem with me to test and see if the prob­lem wasn’t related to the rental Com­cast modem. After a few long min­utes of tweek­ing, the Motorala modem was func­tion­ing prop­erly, with no a drop more band­width. The prob­lem was evi­dently net­work related.

Still the per­son I talked to on the phone insisted it might be due to the house’s wiring. So she asked me if I would like to have a tech­ni­cian come by and check the house. I was reluc­tant, since it was Fri­day, and it would surely mean some­time dur­ing the week, when I’m usu­ally very busy. But to my sur­prise, she offered Sun­day, between 4 and 7pm. I was amazed, you could never dig out a tech­ni­cian on a Sun­day in France. No they would rather work dur­ing the nor­mal week, when peo­ple are at work and can’t answer the door. Or bet­ter yet, have them take half a day off — so that it fits the Inter­net technician’s schedule.

The man was very nice, he checked the modem, saw my friend’s Motorola and told me it was much bet­ter than the default one and that a DOCSIS 3.0 wouldn’t make much of a dif­fer­ence now, but that the new faster speed was being rolled out soon enough. Less than a year he made it sound like. Then he checked the coax­ial lines inside the house and found some noise on the upstream. He seemed to have an eureka moment about this, but I could hardly see why a slight loss of upstream could be caus­ing a 80% loss of band­width. He went to the attic and fixed the upstream noise issue. Which made me very hope­ful. We tested the band­width: no change. He went out­side to the check the con­nec­tion with the node, and came back empty handed. He told me he would have a col­league come by the next day to check the net­work in the area.

This was the last I heard of Comcast.

Today I sub­scribed to AT&T’s U-verse. Not because it’s cheaper: it isn’t. On the con­trary AT&T is far too expen­sive. The equiv­a­lent of the com­plete U-verse bun­dle (Free­box) retails in France at $45 per month, with the high­est speed by default. I chose them sim­ply because their web­site is orga­nized, offers actual infor­ma­tion about the ser­vices pro­vided and most of all, because their band­width poli­cies aren’t reminscent of the late 1990’s.

Of course the com­par­i­son is unfair, I haven’t yet had any sup­port issues with AT&T, but that shouldn’t be Comcast’s prob­lem. What should be Comcast’s prob­lem, and what will be its down­fall in the fol­low­ing months, is that a com­peti­tor as expen­sive as AT&T could com­pare so favorably.

To the Com­cast exec­u­tive who will in the fol­low­ing month strug­gle to under­stand the mas­sive loss in cus­tomers they will likey suf­fer, I can only point to Jeff Jarvis’ excel­lent book “What Would Google Do”. The title is deceiv­ing, it’s not just about Google. In it lies the answer to why the likes of AOL and Yahoo faded away in favor of com­pa­nies who didn’t try to pro­vide con­tent — which is funny since Com­cast is appar­ently try­ing to acquire Dis­ney as an attempt not to be seen as a “dumb tube” — but instead good ser­vice to as many cus­tomers as pos­si­ble for the low­est mar­gin possible.

If that still doesn’t con­vince you, look up Free’s suc­cess story. The French ISP who started as a free alter­na­tive to France’s national oper­a­tor France Tele­com before lead­ing the way in the DSL rev­o­lu­tion and chang­ing the way tele­coms work in the coun­try. Which lead to France becom­ing one of the best and most com­pet­i­tive Inter­net mar­kets in the world, can­cel­ing a 10-year lag in national Inter­net usage.

You can either work on the some­what com­plex project you have to fin­ish pre­ping for Monday.

Or do some­thing fun and easy.